« Mazurland Flashback: 1970's | Main | The Edwards Sheen »

June 22, 2006

Blognitive Dissonance

Tin_foil_hatI was reading  "Wag the Blog" one of the cover pieces on political blogging in this week's New Republic, by TNR Senior Editor Ryan Lizza. My eye's were tired as I skimmed the article, so where the text at one point said "cognitive dissonance", I read "blognitive dissonance" and subconsciously credited Lizza with a self-deprecating "good'un". It seems that quite a few people still don't know what to make of the blogosphere, and this fact causes no end of trouble, not only for politicians and old media types, but for the bloggers themselves.

Many have commented on the differences between conservative and left-wing blogdom. One of those differences is that though left-wingers have very few scalps on their belt, they tend to take themselves much more seriously than conservative bloggers, who have brought down many of the mighty. And the lefties want to be taken very seriously by politicians and the old media. They think they have already succeeded in storming the gates of their own party, and are quite offended when someone questions their place at the table. And perhaps they have succeeded, at least in rattling the Democrats. To prove their clout, DailyKos blogger Markos Moulitsas, the king of lefty bloggers, and hundreds of other like-minded "Kossacks" participated in the inaugural YearlyKos, a giant lefty blogger confab, in Las Vegas last week. In attendance were Democratic legislators, leaders, and Presidential hopefuls, as well as reporters from the old media.

Notable was the lack of protocol and pecking order. It was like Captain Kirk meeting the King of Uranus. Who bows? Who scrapes? Should a politician act blog-savvy or folksy and ready to learn? How should reporters spin the event? Can they roll their eyes at the whole affair? How many politicians' hands can a Kossack shake and maintain his "street cred"? Was Governor Warner's $50,000 coming out party for the bloggers a goodwill gesture or an obscene attempt at a buyout. And how many blogger reputations will be ruined just by a meeting in-the-flesh? Also notable was the absence of one Presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. The lady is looking smarter all the time.

Any liberal risks the wrath of the lefty bloggers when criticizing them. But Lizza himself was cautiously skeptical of the whole YearlyKos affair. Far from circumspect, because he had no need to be, was Matt Labash of the Weekly Standard as he reported in his inimitably snarky style on his Ride with the Kossacks:

"WHOA! DID YOU JUST FEEL THAT? Did you just feel the earth stop spinning on its axis, then reverse its rotation? Did you feel the moon enter into its Seventh House, and Jupiter align with Mars? Did you feel Jesus stomp off in a snit, as He was replaced at the right hand of God by Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, aka Kos? As in the eponymous blog Daily Kos? As in the four-year-old progressive website that is galvanizing the netroots and igniting the People Powered Movement? As in the site that is reshaping the political landscape, uprooting the old order, and, in Kos's words, relegating those who'd stand in the movement's way "to the dustbin of history"? Oh--and which is also a place where people blog about themselves?"

By all accounts, the YearlyKos crowd came out of Vegas looking more and more like part of the ideologically driven MoveOn/Deaniac wing of the Democratic party.

TNR's other cover story was a somewhat baffling farrago by Christine Rosen, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and senior editor of The New Atlantis, A Journal of Technology and Society. The article takes on techno-utopian bloggers of the libertarian/conservative persuasion. Her main target is Glenn Reynolds, the blogger dynamo behind InstaPundit. The story is mainly a hit piece on the Heh-Meister, upbraiding Reynolds for everything from his supposed gee-whiz techno-uptopianism to the lack of substance in his blogs. While some of her criticisms of Reynolds' ideas and style are at least arguable, her article fundamentally misrepresents or misunderstands not only much of what Reynolds says, but also his style, and even his use of hyperlinks. Now that's just plan dumb. (Heh.)

[The New Republic articles mentioned above are only available online in "teaser" form. If you're interested in them, subscribe online or borrow a copy of the magazine from your library. The Weekly Standard admirably makes available online the contents of its current edition as well as much from older editions.]

Update: LGF reports on how the dissonance in the Kosmos has become a cacaphony. Jiffy Pop, anyone?

Update (2): The circle has been closed. The feedback is ringing, though not dissonantly, in my ears. Welcome InstaPundit readers!

June 22, 2006 by Marty | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c783f53ef00d834cfe1f769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blognitive Dissonance:

Comments

So does that mean, by misreading it, you just coined the phrase "Blognitive Dissonance"? If so, I was there when it happened! Sweet!

Also, is that image of a baseball cap that says "tin foil hat" on it a photoshop job or a real thing? Because if it's real, I WANT ONE.

Posted by: Ben | Jun 22, 2006 4:29:00 PM

I am sorry to disappoint you twice, Ben.

I thought I might have brain-farted that term into existence. Upon Googling it, I found that it's been done. Not by too man people, but one in particular of them has a prominent site by that very name. The site is odd. It's done by a very whitebread looking Mormon guy (is there any other kind?) who uses it for two things: promoting his graphic art, which is OK stuff, and also for doing some LDS scripture study. That was weird. It seems to be just lists of every word in every chapter of the Book of Mormon and their frequency of occurence. It's like the whole geneological excavation thing they do, except with words. It seems pointless in the extreme.

WRT the hat, it is a cool hat, but you'll have to buy it from a liberal. Or at least from Cafe Press at the behest of a liberal.

Posted by: Marty | Jun 22, 2006 4:41:36 PM

One other difference between liberal and conservative blogs is that there's an undercurrent of anger on the Left that isn't as evident on the Right. Of course the Lefties will argue otherwise, and both side certainly post with passion, but I see a hell of a lot more humor in the posts, and especially the comments, from conservative blogs. And I find humor, not just because I agree with it (I mean I find Jon Stewart funny and he's liberal), but because it's truly there.

Yes, believe it or not, conservatives are more lighthearted, which is why they're happier.

Posted by: Chris | Jun 22, 2006 5:41:35 PM

BTW, Ben, in searching for a graphic for this post, I did a full stop when I came across the hat. It had such a "This Is Not A Pipe" air about it, and so instigated some cognitive dissonance in me when I saw it.

Posted by: Marty | Jun 22, 2006 5:44:35 PM

Yes, believe it or not, conservatives are more lighthearted, which is why they're happier.

Oddly enough, this has actually been proven to be true for decades in Pew polling.

Some 45% of all Republicans report being very happy, compared with just 30% of Democrats and 29% of independents. This finding has also been around a long time; Republicans have been happier than Democrats every year since the General Social Survey began taking its measurements in 1972.

http://pewresearch.org/social/pack.php?PackID=1

Posted by: TallDave | Jun 23, 2006 4:03:41 PM

Thanks, TallDave. Mazurland has known this and been all giggly about it for some time.

Posted by: Marty | Jun 23, 2006 4:10:35 PM

A very humorous look at the leftist mind. They really are screwed up.

Posted by: Toog | Jun 23, 2006 6:16:34 PM

At 49, Marty reads at the 51 year old level.

It cracked me up. Nice bios.

Posted by: Tom v G | Jun 23, 2006 8:46:42 PM

Toog: Great site. Is that yours? I've gotta dig into that archive.

Tom v G: Tänan teid väga! (Estonian for "Thank you very much!")

Posted by: Marty | Jun 23, 2006 9:37:55 PM

"The site is odd. It's done by a very whitebread looking Mormon guy (is there any other kind?)" well ... yes.

Though Danithew is a nice guy.

He also does other stuff, besides the art and the wordlists, just mostly at places other than his namesake blog (which used to be named wumpblog).


Posted by: Stephen M (Ethesis) | Jun 24, 2006 1:50:11 PM

Yes, I guess you might describe me as "a white-bread looking Mormon guy" ...

To answer your question, there are other kinds of Mormon guys. These days most Mormons live outside the United States.

I thought up the term "blognitive dissonance" in December 2004 when I was reading a post about stages of blognitive development. That's when the term blognitive dissonance popped into my head. Here's the comment (signed by my moniker "danithew").

The lists of words for Book of Mormon are fairly useless or at least appear pretty useless by themselves. I'm aware of that. I've gotten plenty of "why the heck are you doing that" feedback from a variety of people. I can handle that because the word lists are just an initial phase in a larger personal project with the text of the Book of Mormon. I'm planning to use these word lists as a foundation for a study page format that will allow readers to create Book of Mormon commentary. I'm sure (being sarcastic here) that my saying that will immediately alleviate your skepticism on the subject.

I'm glad that you find the graphic art to be okay. :)

Posted by: danithew | Aug 31, 2006 12:22:56 AM

Post a comment