« We Can Only Hope | Main | King For A Day »

January 25, 2006

Defining Evil Down

Googleevil_1Google's informal corporate motto is "Don't Be Evil". What that has to do with running a search engine, I have no idea. But there has always been a bit of smarmy, self-satisfied, self-righteousness to that motto, not to mention hypocrisy, particularly in light of the company's policies. The company has come under scrutiny for refusing to run some conservative advertisements, and for other forms of ideological bias. Google's stand on First and Fourth Amendment protections in, for example, this case is absolutist, congruent to that of the ACLU, and likely to provide protection as well to the likes of child pornographers. It's probably only incidental that Google also likely benefits commercially from such a stance. Less tenuous is the link between Google's agreement to censor its search results in China and the company's own bottom line. Google will adhere to that country's free-speech restrictions in return for better access in the internet's fastest growing market.

I think a change in Google's motto is in order. I think Mazurland can help. Seattle blogger Jim Miller has gotten the ball rolling by suggesting Google be honest and say that it's OK to "Be Just A Little Bit Evil". There are many possibilities, some almost too ripe for the picking: from everyday speech, "See No Evil"; from film, "A Touch of Evil"; or, considering how Google's desktop tools are rummaging around people's computers, "Resident Evil".

[Image from Addict3D.org.]

Update: Michelle Malkin has started a China-Google Protest Logo Album.

January 25, 2006 by Marty | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c783f53ef00d8345d244269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Defining Evil Down:

» China-Google Protest Logos from RightWinged.com
If you hadn't already heard the newly launched Chinese version of Google is a censored one... There was a lot of speculation on whether or not Google would cave, and in the end they did. Read that article for the... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 27, 2006 6:19:09 PM

» China-Google Protest Logos from RightWinged.com
If you hadn't already heard the newly launched Chinese version of Google is a censored one... There was a lot of speculation on whether or not Google would cave, and in the end they did. Read that article for the... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 27, 2006 6:22:54 PM

» China-Google Protest Logos from RightWinged.com
If you hadn't already heard the newly launched Chinese version of Google is a censored one... There was a lot of speculation on whether or not Google would cave, and in the end they did. Read that article for the... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 27, 2006 6:26:06 PM

» Chinese "Year Of The Dog" Google Logo. What A Year It Will Be For Dogs in China... from RightWinged.com
Setting aside the protest logos we've all been creating to mock Google's caving in to Chinese censorship, this is the REAL logo currently at Google.cn, obviously to usher in the Year of the Dog (happy version linked here). The REAL... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 29, 2006 5:44:03 AM

» Chinese "Year Of The Dog" Google Logo. What A Year It Will Be For Dogs in China... from RightWinged.com
Setting aside the protest logos we've all been creating to mock Google's caving in to Chinese censorship, this is the REAL logo currently at Google.cn, obviously to usher in the Year of the Dog (happy version linked here). The REAL... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 29, 2006 5:47:26 AM

» Chinese "Year Of The Dog" Google Logo. What A Year It Will Be For Dogs in China... from RightWinged.com
Setting aside the protest logos we've all been creating to mock Google's caving in to Chinese censorship, this is the REAL logo currently at Google.cn, obviously to usher in the Year of the Dog (happy version linked here). The REAL... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 29, 2006 5:50:27 AM

Comments

Internet is the media where evil has made it's nest, compared to internet old Sodom and Gomorra would look like the kindergarten. Here is my article on this subject posted at 09:00 AM Do - Mei 27, 2004 on the ChallengeBig Brother Got New Job

Posted by: Boris | Jan 26, 2006 2:16:54 AM

You don't get to be a multi-billionare by being nice.

The philanthropic and social "causes" of Google, Microsoft or Ben and Jerry's are window dressing. They're usually calculated PR moves, or motivated out of guilt of being so obscenely materialistic. Their corporate decisions, like this one, tell the real story.

None of this applies to Apple computer, of course.

Posted by: chris | Jan 26, 2006 11:24:09 AM

I think some of these people really believe their own bullshit.

BTW, Chris, regarding Apple, would that be the same Apple whose CEO, in his capacity as CEO of another underdog company (Pixar), recently merged said underdog with its evil, world destroying rival (Disney)? Could an Apple-Microsoft merger be far behind?

Posted by: Marty | Jan 26, 2006 11:32:21 AM

Check out the difference if you do a search for "tiananmen square" using Our Google vs. China's google.

Posted by: chris | Jan 26, 2006 4:19:55 PM

Chris is right concerning Apple :)... but knowledge is power I honestly doubt that these Chinese or Saudis who speak English use local Google, while we do only use our local "unfiltered" version. Other thing, why does Google blocks websites with offensive text towards high mainly political personalities and at same time give right to it self to make cynical jokes as that one with "miserable failure". That makes it all even worser. But one even bigger mystery for me is that not only text is analyzed but photos too, (call me naive) but i do not get it how, words can be easily filtered but photo is something else it's just bunch of few million dots, on the Challenge page Why did I quit Friendster there is photo of young men smoking cigaret and Google ads which are appearing there are always from the "Quit Smoking" campaigners. (I hope you'll see them too.)

Posted by: Boris | Jan 26, 2006 6:35:42 PM

Boris,
I was thinking that it's the *words* in the referring page that Google is "seeing", not the photo.
In your example, the word "quit" in the post's title may be the explanation. If I'm wrong, and they're actually scanning the photos, that's even scarier.

Posted by: chris | Jan 26, 2006 6:43:44 PM

Michelle Malkin has more on this.

Posted by: chris | Jan 26, 2006 6:48:06 PM

Chris, Boris:

It's probably a combination of the name of the scanned photo and the text in the surrounding document. Also may include web page title, etc.

Posted by: Marty | Jan 26, 2006 6:51:19 PM

Little Green Footballs has a post uncannily similar to my previous comment, which was posted 7 hours later than my comment.

No credit given, but you know all the influential blogs are watching Mazurland.

Posted by: chris | Jan 27, 2006 10:04:29 AM

Isn't this that same guy in front the tank but than filtered out for Chinese public? ;-)

Posted by: Boris | Jan 27, 2006 12:11:27 PM

Post a comment